Reference |
Allele Change |
Risk Allele |
Statistical Values |
Author Comments |
Result of Statistical Analysis |
Kim JW, 2008 |
|
|
X2=0.943, P-value=0.331, OR=1.1
X2=0.943, P-value=0.331, OR=1.1
|
not associated with ADHD
not associated with ADHD
|
Non-significant
|
Xu X, 2005(a) |
|
|
allelic X2 statistic P-value=0.066, OR=1.2
allelic X2 statistic P-value=0.066, OR=1.2
|
no evidence for association
no evidence for association
|
Non-significant
|
Ilott NE, 2010 |
|
|
QTDT AT P-value=0.07, X2=3.3, df=1, QTDT AW P-val......
QTDT AT P-value=0.07, X2=3.3, df=1, QTDT AW P-value=0.04, X2=4.42, df=1 at age 2; QTDT AT P-value=0.59, X2=0.83, df=1, QTDT AW P-value=0.07, X2=3.22, df=1 at age 3
More...
|
modest, nominally significant associations in the AW test at......
modest, nominally significant associations in the AW test at age 2
More...
|
Significant
|
Forero DA, 2009 |
C/T |
|
|
Not significant for the total samples.
Not significant for the total samples.
|
Non-significant
|
Bobb AJ, 2005 |
|
|
allelic TDT P-value=0.91, OR=0.98 in case-control analysis; ......
allelic TDT P-value=0.91, OR=0.98 in case-control analysis; allelic TDT P-value=0.009, RR=1.96 in family-based analysis
More...
|
there was preferential transmission of the C allele to ADHD ......
there was preferential transmission of the C allele to ADHD probands
More...
|
Significant
|
De Luca V, 2004 (a) |
G/A |
A |
TDT P-value=0.647, ANOVA P-value=0.941, FBAT P-value=0.48 fo......
TDT P-value=0.647, ANOVA P-value=0.941, FBAT P-value=0.48 for Wender, FBAT P-value=0.25 for BDD activation, FBAT P-value=0.17 for BDD attention, FBAT P-value=0.26 for BDD total
More...
|
There was no preferential transmission of either allele
There was no preferential transmission of either allele
|
Non-significant
|
Sengupta, S. M., 2012 |
C/T |
|
P-value=0.08, Z statistic (allele 1)=1.76
P-value=0.08, Z statistic (allele 1)=1.76
|
No significant association was found in this study.
No significant association was found in this study.
|
Non-significant
|