Reference |
Allele Change |
Risk Allele |
Statistical Values |
Author Comments |
Result of Statistical Analysis |
Forero DA, 2009 |
|
|
|
Not significant for the total samples.
Not significant for the total samples.
|
Non-significant
|
Li J, 2007 |
|
|
Allelic TDT P-value=0.834 for ADHD, P-value=0.728 for ADHD-C......
Allelic TDT P-value=0.834 for ADHD, P-value=0.728 for ADHD-C, P-value=0.683 for ADHD-I
More...
|
No significant biased transmission of any allele was observe......
No significant biased transmission of any allele was observed for ADHD or subtypes of ADHD.
More...
|
Non-significant
|
Banerjee E, 2006 |
A10/A12 |
|
X2=1.137, df=1; P-value=0.286; HHRR P-value=0.027......
X2=1.137, df=1; P-value=0.286; HHRR P-value=0.027, X2=4.92, RR=1.47; TDT P-value=0.008, X2=7.00, OR=3.00; paternal transmission HHRR P-value=0.437, X2=0.604, RR=1.24, TDT P-value=0.405, X2=0.692, OR=1.60; maternal transmission HHRR P-value=0.011, X2=6.532, RR=2.00, TDT P-value=0.005, X2=8.066, OR=6.50
More...
|
A12 allele is statistically significant in HHRR and TDT anal......
A12 allele is statistically significant in HHRR and TDT analysis, and in maternal inheritance
More...
|
Significant
|
Kim SJ, 2005 |
|
|
allelic TDT P-value=0.72 for ADHD pooled together, TDT P-val......
allelic TDT P-value=0.72 for ADHD pooled together, TDT P-value=0.2 for ADHD without ADHD NOS subtype; compared to the previous reports from Korean populations [Kim et al., 2000, 2004a; Pae et al.,2003], Intron 2 VNTR allele frequencies: X2=0.001, df=1, P-value=0.97; Intron 2 VNTR allele frequencies: X2=0.64, df=2, P-value=0.73 among ADHD subtype groups excluding ADHD NOS subtype
More...
|
no significant association was detected in the family-based ......
no significant association was detected in the family-based study and no significant difference compared to the previous study
More...
|
Non-significant
|
Xu X, 2005(b) |
|
|
allelic ETDT P-value=0.497, X2=1.399 in UK sample......
allelic ETDT P-value=0.497, X2=1.399 in UK samples; allelic ETDT P-value=0.440, X2=1.644 in Taiwanese samples; allelic ETDT P-value=0.355, X2=2.071 in combined samples; allelic HHRR P-value=0.517, X2=1.318 in UK samples; allelic HHRR P-value=0.446, X2=1.615 in Taiwanese samples; HHRR P-value=0.381, X2=1.929 in combined samples; allelic TRANSMIT P-value=0.850, X2=0.324 in UK samples; allelic TRANSMIT P-value=0.706, X2=0.692 in Taiwanese samples; allelic TRANSMIT P-value=0.813, X2=0.413 in combined samples
More...
|
there was no significant preferential transmission in UK sam......
there was no significant preferential transmission in UK samples, Taiwanese samples and combined samples
More...
|
Non-significant
|
Gizer IR, 2009 |
|
10R |
Meta-analysis model: Fixed: OR=1.01, 95% CI=0.92-1.10, P-val......
Meta-analysis model: Fixed: OR=1.01, 95% CI=0.92-1.10, P-value=0.428; Q-statistic: P-value=0.85, I2=0
More...
|
no evidence to suggest an association between this polymorph......
no evidence to suggest an association between this polymorphisms and ADHD
More...
|
Non-significant
|
Oades RD, 2008 |
|
|
P-value= 0.050 for cognitive impulsivity
P-value= 0.050 for cognitive impulsivity
|
nominally significant association
nominally significant association
|
Significant
|
Xu X, 2008(a) |
9/10/12 allele |
|
TDT P-value=1.00, X2=0.00, OR=1.00, for 9 allele;......
TDT P-value=1.00, X2=0.00, OR=1.00, for 9 allele; TDT P-value=0.74, X2=0.11, OR=1.02, for 10 allele; TDT P-value=0.74, X2=0.11, OR=0.98, for 12 allele
More...
|
were not significantly associated with ADHD
were not significantly associated with ADHD
|
Non-significant
|
Heiser P, 2007 |
340/357/391 |
|
allelic PDT P-value=0.45
allelic PDT P-value=0.45
|
showed no statistically significant preferential transmissio......
showed no statistically significant preferential transmission of any allele
More...
|
Non-significant
|
Spencer, T. J., 2012 |
|
12R |
P-value=NS, X2=0.11
P-value=NS, X2=0.11
|
the gene frequencies of each of the gene polymorphisms asses......
the gene frequencies of each of the gene polymorphisms assessed did not differ between the ADHD and control groups.
More...
|
Non-significant
|
Beitchman JH, 2003 |
|
|
P-value=0.015, X2=5.959 for 10R allele
P-value=0.015, X2=5.959 for 10R allele
|
10R allele was significantly less frequent among cases than ......
10R allele was significantly less frequent among cases than controls, associated with aggressive behavior in this sample
More...
|
Significant
|
Langley K, 2003 |
|
|
ETDT P-value=0.619, X2=0.248 for allele 10, ETDT ......
ETDT P-value=0.619, X2=0.248 for allele 10, ETDT P-value=0.763, X2=0.091 for allele 12, TRANSMIT P-value=0.516 in the total sample; allelic P-value=0.14, X2=2.14, OR=0.992 in the case-control analysis
More...
|
no significant preferential transmission was found in the to......
no significant preferential transmission was found in the total sample, and no significant differences were found when clumped alleles 9 and 10 for the case-control analysis
More...
|
Non-significant
|
Kent L, 2002 |
9, 10, 12 repeat |
10 repeat |
TDT P-value>0.05
TDT P-value>0.05
|
No significant evidence was found for biased transmission
No significant evidence was found for biased transmission
|
Non-significant
|
Zoroglu SS, 2002 |
|
|
Fisher¡¯s exact test, allelic P-value=0.288; Pearson P-value......
Fisher¡¯s exact test, allelic P-value=0.288; Pearson P-value=0.001, X2=13.27, d.f.=2 of STin2.12/12 genotype
More...
|
there was no significant difference between the frequencies ......
there was no significant difference between the frequencies of the VNTR STin2.10 and STin2.12 alleles; the VNTR STin2.12/12 genotype was significantly less in the patients than the controls
More...
|
Significant
|