Hot Results
Quick Search
Large-scale studies
- Genome-wide Association Studies of ADHD
- Genome-wide Linkage Studies of ADHD
- Genome-wide CNV Analyses of ADHD
- Meta-analysis Studies of ADHD
Data Summary
Study Report
| Reference | Wigg KG, 200819076634 |
|---|---|
| Citation | Wigg K. G., Feng Y., Crosbie J., Tannock R., Kennedy J. L., Ickowicz A., Malone M., Schachar R. and Barr C. L. (2008) "Association of ADHD and the Protogenin gene in the chromosome 15q21.3 reading disabilities linkage region." Genes Brain Behav, 7(8): 877-86. |
| Study Design | family-based |
| Study Type | Candidate-gene association study |
| Sample Size | 253 nuclear families |
| Predominant Ethnicity | Caucasian |
| Population | Canada |
| Gender | 242 boys and 58 girls |
| Age Group | Children/Adolescents : 7-16 years |
| Summary | To continue study of 15q, they tested a coding region change in DYX1C1, followed bymarkers across the gene Protogenin (PRTG) in 253 ADHD nuclear families. PRTG was chosen based on its location and because it is closely related to DCC and Neogenin, two genes known to guidemigratory cells and axons during development. The markers in DYX1C1 were not associated to ADHD when analyzed individually; however, six markers in PRTG showed significant association with ADHD as a categorical trait. Haplotypes in both genes showed evidence for association. They identified association with ADHD symptoms measured as quantitative traits in PRTG, but no evidence for association with two key components of reading, word identification and decoding was observed. |
|---|---|
| Total Sample | The study sample was comprised of 253 nuclear families from the Toronto area, including 47 affected siblings. This gave a total of 300 affected children (242 boys and 58 girls). The majority of the families reported their ethnic background to be of European Caucasian descent, while 10% of families were of other or mixed background, including Chinese, African, Indian and native Canadians. |
| Sample Collection | European Caucasian descent, and other or mixed background, including Chinese, African, Indian and native Canadians |
| Diagnosis Description | Probands and affected siblings were recruited from the Child Development and Neuropsychiatry Clinics at the Hospital for Sick Children. The selection criteria for inclusion were subjects between the ages of 7 and 16 years that met the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder, 4th Edition (DSM-IV) criteria for ADHD. For the diagnoses of ADHD and information on ADHD symptoms, two informants were used: the parents completed the Parent Interview for Child Symptoms and the teachers were administered the Teacher Telephone Interview for Children's Academic Performance. For the affected children, the distribution among the DSM-IV ADHD subtypes was 14% of the predominantly hyperactive/impulsive subtype, 24% of the predominantly inattentive subtype and 62% of the combined subtype. |
| Technique | DNA was extracted from blood lymphocytes using a high salt extraction method. The SNPs across the PRTG gene were selected using the Tagger Pairwise Method as implemented on the International HapMap Project Browser as well as three publicly reported synonymous and nonsynonymous SNPs. For DYX1C1, eight SNPs were genotyped, eight of these had been previously genotyped in 186 of the ADHD families and the genotyping was updated in our expanded sample. Two additional SNPs, rs600753 and rs16787 in the DYX1C1 gene were also genotyped. The SNP assays weremanufactured by Applied Biosystems as either Assays-On-Demand or as Assays-by-Design. |
| Analysis Method | The extended transmission disequilibrium test program was used to test for the biased transmission of alleles at each marker, based on the categorical diagnosis of DSM-IV ADHD. Permutation analysis for the categorical results was performed using the UNPHASED 3.0 program. The transmission of the haplotypes was analyzed with the TRANSMIT program. |
| Result Description | The markers in DYX1C1 were not associated to ADHD when analyzed individually; however, six markers in PRTG showed significant association with ADHD as a categorical trait. Haplotypes in both genes showed evidence for association. They identified association with ADHD symptoms measured as quantitative traits in PRTG, but no evidence for association with two key components of reading, word identification and decoding was observed. |
| SNP | Allele Change | Risk Allele | Statistical Values | Author Comments | Result of Statistical Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs9920546 | A/G | TDT P-value=0.47, X2=0.521 | no evidence for association no evidence for association | Non-significant | |
| rs1011061 | T/C | TDT P-value=0.842, X2=0.04 | no evidence for association no evidence for association | Non-significant | |
| rs11071200 | T/G | TDT P-value=0.026, X2=4.959 | was significantly associated to ADHD was significantly associated to ADHD | Significant | |
| rs11629841 | A/C | TDT P-value=0.488, X2=0.482 | no evidence for association no evidence for association | Non-significant | |
| rs11852746 | A/G | TDT P-value=0.729, X2=0.12 | no evidence for association no evidence for association | Non-significant | |
| rs11854213 | T/C | TDT P-value=0.773, X2=0.083 | no evidence for association no evidence for association | Non-significant | |
| rs12438177 | C/T | TDT P-value=0.775, X2=0.082 | no evidence for association no evidence for association | Non-significant | |
| rs12591646 | A/C | TDT P-value=0.025, X2=5.026 | was significantly associated to ADHD was significantly associated to ADHD | Significant | |
| rs1438914 | T/A | TDT P-value=0.016, X2=5.76 | was significantly associated to ADHD was significantly associated to ADHD | Significant | |
| rs1550326 | C/A | TDT P-value=0.209, X2=1.576 | no evidence for association no evidence for association | Non-significant | |
| rs2007494 | T/A | TDT P-value=0.114, X2=2.5 | no evidence for association no evidence for association | Non-significant | |
| rs16976466 | G/A | TDT P-value=0.584, X2=0.3 | no evidence for association no evidence for association | Non-significant | |
| rs3743204 | C/A | TDT P-value=0.151, X2=2.063 | no evidence for association no evidence for association | Non-significant | |
| rs2414424 | A/G | TDT P-value=0.005, X2=8.067; P-value=0.046 after permutation testing | was significantly associated to ADHD was significantly associated to ADHD | Significant | |
| rs3985768 | T/A | TDT P-value=0.832, X2=0.045 | no evidence for association no evidence for association | Non-significant | |
| rs3743205 | G/A | TDT P-value=0.574, X2=0.316 | no evidence for association no evidence for association | Non-significant | |
| rs492363 | T/C | TDT P-value=0.459, X2=0.549 | no evidence for association no evidence for association | Non-significant | |
| rs4774800 | A/G | TDT P-value=0.18, X2=1.795 | no evidence for association no evidence for association | Non-significant | |
| rs558290 | A/G | TDT P-value=0.142, X2=2.16 | no evidence for association no evidence for association | Non-significant | |
| rs530798 | T/C | TDT P-value=0.375, X2=0.786 | no evidence for association no evidence for association | Non-significant | |
| rs692691 | G/A | TDT P-value=0.754, X2=0.098 | no evidence for association no evidence for association | Non-significant | |
| rs600753 | G/A | TDT P-value=0.492, X2=0.472 | no evidence for association no evidence for association | Non-significant | |
| rs7165971 | A/G | TDT P-value=0.011, X2=6.416 | was significantly associated to ADHD was significantly associated to ADHD | Significant | |
| rs7162879 | T/A | TDT P-value=0.018, X2=5.555 | was significantly associated to ADHD was significantly associated to ADHD | Significant | |
| rs934886 | C/T | TDT P-value=0.455, X2=0.558 | no evidence for association no evidence for association | Non-significant | |
| rs7183943 | T/C | TDT P-value=0.581, X2=0.305 | no evidence for association no evidence for association | Non-significant |
| Variant Name | Allele Change | Risk Allele | Statistical Values | Author Comments | Result of Statistical Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DYX1C1 1249G/T | G/T | TDT P-value=1.00, X2=0.00 TDT P-value=1.00, X2=0.00 | no evidence for association | Non-significant |
| Gene | Statistical Values/Author Comments | Result of Statistical Analysis |
|---|---|---|
| DYX1C1 | haplotypes of the six markers P-value=0.078, X2=6...... haplotypes of the six markers P-value=0.078, X2=6.809, df=1, no significant association More... | Non-significant |
| PRTG | haplotype AA P-value=0.007, X2 (df=1)=7.155; hapl...... haplotype AA P-value=0.007, X2 (df=1)=7.155; haplotype GC P-value=0.023, X2 (df=1)=5.208; P-value=0.033, X2 (df=3)=8.7482 in global chi-square test; P-value=0.026, chi-squared test on 2 df for haplotypes with frequency >10%=7.2969 of rs7165971 and rs12591646; haplotype AAC P-value=0.017, X2 (df=1)=5.670; P-value=0.018, X2 (df=6) =15.258 in global chi-square test; P-value=0.007, chi-squared test on 3 df for haplotypes with frequency >10%=12.051 of rs2414424, rs3985768 and rs1011061; showed significant association with ADHD More... | Significant |
Copyright: Bioinformatics Lab, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences Feedback
Last update: Feb 26, 2014



